it has nothing to do with "shame".
it has to do with the artist's intention of how his art is perceived. it has to do with the artist creating a body of work that represents what he feels is his expression of the truth regarding humanity and the life experience. my point is simply this: to question whether or not reviewing things that are outside of the artist's deliberate body of work should be considered when analyzing his art as a body of work. i believe that those things should not be considered. if you do, excellent!
i'll keep discussing this if you agree to stick to the point.