Litkicks Message Board Archive

I allow her opinion...

Posted to Utterances




...but she said BY ANY MEAN NECESSARY...

...house to house search don't occur now, but then, 10 years ago we didn't have to worry about cameras everywhere either...what if the government said house to house searches are important if they are to stop child porn (just as they are claiming it is important to invade your home computer)? Would you allow it then?

....i stand by original statement: The act of creating and distributing child porn should be illegal. So should possessing it. I do not, however, think the government should be allowed to invade someone's privacy...there are other ways to prevent crime...

...in public I still expect a certain amount of privacy...