Is there any proof
for any of these statements or are we to believe them cos we were told to. Dude if you believe everything you read then you'll eat everything you see. If war was really necessary and if war was the only answer and if the threat was that great why couldn't they find one single scrap of evidence and don't come back with the Rumsfeld type logic, wasn't it he who laughably said that the absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence. Where was the proof, if you had it we would have seen it. Another thing, and I think it was Cook who said something like the reason war must be started now is because the Iraqi force are at their weakest point, both the US and UK have stated this, if we are to believe that, how can we believe that Iraq poses a credible threat to mankind.
It just doesn't add up .... !!!