OK, if you say so, I believe you :-)
This is interesting what you're saying, but why not object to something specific in the article, once you decided to object. I mean, instead of offering up something as vague and unspecific as "oh it's just more arrogance, etc."
What you've added has nothing to do with the piece. You go, yeah, I've read it -- but it's not visible that you have. Say something about the article -- if you didn't like it, OK: show why, what's wrong with it, where is it arrogant, quote from it, attach your explanations, and so on and so forth.
We'd like to learn from your comments, but you gotta be specific to make that possible, you see.