And I thought I was the only one who felt this way. You said it straight out. Whew! What a relief!
The trouble is, as I said to Panta, I honestly don't think he gets it. I honestly don't think he comprehends the errors in some of the stuff he's put forth. Hence, the endless questions. But, unfortunately, we're not running a logic, history and philosophy class on this board, so regardless of how anyone attempts to answer his questions, he's going to keep running into the same errors, again and again. I had high hopes that just a little light would seep through the cracks for him on this board, but he is just going back, again and again, through the old tired motions. Nobody's switched on the lights for him and he hasn't switched on any, himself, either.
Perhaps the best thing to do is just work around it? Maybe we are trying too hard? I have been trying to ignore him, myself, but this Prager posting just got me so hot I had to respond. That was my mistake, but perhaps we should start over and just try to go about our business. Let those who agree with Tfire respond to him, and we will do whatever other postings we can ...